Saturday, July 9, 2011

My Theory on Pets

In the back of this weeks newspaper there is an article saying there will be a new pet in two weeks, they had this picture:
My Theory: I Think that the new pet will be non member.
Im positive that it will be a butterfly. It would make sense for Animal jam to come out with four pets (duck, frog, cat, & dog) for members. They probably did that so that it would seem like non members would never have pets, so then more people would become members. Now, weeks later, they announce the new butterfly coming soon . It makes sense that they would only let us non-members have an insect as a pet, you know? My logic is that they cant have an article in the newspaper about how all non members matter to them too when they give members pets and give us none at all.

If my theory about the nonmember butterfly is correct, then this may be the outcome:

----Members ----
-up to 4 Pets
-can choose between a frog, dog, cat or duck
-can have rare pets
-can choose a name for their pet - -are able groom their pet (future feature)

----Non Members ----
-can only have a butterfly
- cannot have rare pets
- cannot groom their pet
-cannot choose a name for their pet
(maybe even MORE restrictions!)

Also in the new crystal sands there is a little shack that hasn't opened yet. (that is what i meant by future feature) I think this is going to be a place where you can groom & bathe your pets. It will probably be members only because your cant give a butterfly a bath (if my theory about the nonmember pet is correct)
It looks like this:
Remember this is only a guess so dont get your hopes up too high!

Keep on jammin'! =)
-Wcc Moderator bunnylove3

10 comments:

  1. Wcc Mod HjacklerJuly 09, 2011

    Thats a good analysis bunnylove :) i think i would agree wiht that! let me know if you want me to find out by hacking aj hq if there IS going to be non member pets

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wcc Moderator: bunnylove3July 09, 2011

    I edited the outcome chart. it got messed up ^.^
    @hjackler
    please dont hack its against the law and i dont know why u do it. not to be rude

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Hjackler
    Yeah...Don't hack...

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ hjackler
    I don't care if you do it as long as you leave no signs for YOUR safty i'm fine wth ir

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Hjackler
    It's better if you didn't...
    @Bunnylove3
    Good theory! Although I think nonmembers may be able to name their pets, the rest makes a lot of sense!

    ReplyDelete
  6. if yall want i will hack them if they ban my account so idc i have 2 backup accounts....well 3 really

    that was @ everyone

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Bunnylove3:
    I think your predictions are gonna be right :).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wcc Moderator: bunnylove3July 09, 2011

    @sliverstorm yeah i think your right...

    @Jindo: I hope so!

    ReplyDelete
  9. FunPinkyPinkyJuly 11, 2011

    Honestly, I don't think pets will ever be available to Non-members.

    Just my opinion. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wcc Mod HjacklerJuly 11, 2011

    :(

    ReplyDelete

Hello! When using the comment form, there are 3 pre-posting checks:
1. Does it say what you want it to?
2. Is it nice (no bad words)?
3. Did you use HTML code correctly (if you used it)?